The lab report below was submitted as part of the coursework for CM2102 Spectroscopic Applications. Please do not plagiarise from it as plagiarism might land you into trouble with your university. Do note that my report is well-circulated online and many of my juniors have received soft copies of it. Hence, please exercise prudence while referring to it and, if necessary, cite this webpage.
1. Aim
To show that the inversion of sucrose in acid solution is a
reaction of the first order with respect to sucrose, to evaluate the rate
constants of the reactions, k and to find out the degree of hydrolysis of urea
hydrochloride.
2. Experimental
Preparation of solutions
20g of dry
sucrose was made up to 100mL of water as Solution A. Using accurate dilution of
2M HCl (Solution B), a 100mL solution C of 1M HCl was prepared. Some urea was
dried overnight over calcium oxide and 60.06g (constituting 0.1mol) was weighed
out. Using the appropriate volume of solution B that contains 0.1mol HCl, the
weighed urea was dissolved and made up to 100mL in a volumetric flask.
Measurement of Angle of
rotation
25mL of each
solution A and C were pipetted into separate dry flasks and the surrounding
temperature was recorded. The polarimeter was set up. The stopwatch was started
and both solutions A and C were mixed thoroughly by pouring back and forth a
few times. As quickly as possible, a clean, dry polarimeter tube was filled
with the mixed solution and the angle of rotation was measured and recorded. At
the beginning, readings were taken at intervals of 5 minutes for 20 minutes.
Subsequently readings were taken every 10 minutes. Three readings were taken at
each time, and the average of the three readings was calculated. The
experimental procedures were repeated, using Solutions A and D instead. The
final readings at t=∞ for both sets of mixtures were taken after setting the
reaction mixtures aside for 48 hours.
3. Results and
Calculations
Preparation of
solution A
Mass of sucrose added = 20.0096 g
Mass of sucrose added = 20.0096 g
Preparation of
solution of C:
Concentration of stock HCl solution (solution B) = 2.100 M
To prepare 1 M HCl solution in 100 mL solution, V1M1=V2M2, vol. x 2.100 = 1 x 0.1
Volume of stock HCl solution needed = 0.1 / 2.100 = 0.04762 L = 47.62 mL
Concentration of stock HCl solution (solution B) = 2.100 M
To prepare 1 M HCl solution in 100 mL solution, V1M1=V2M2, vol. x 2.100 = 1 x 0.1
Volume of stock HCl solution needed = 0.1 / 2.100 = 0.04762 L = 47.62 mL
Preparation of
solution of D:
Amount of dry urea required = 0.1 x 60.06 gmol-1=
6.006 g
Mass of urea added = 6.0075 g
Temperature of surroundings = 25.0 ˚C
Table of
polarimeter angle readings at different time for HCl solution (A&C):
Time t/min
|
6.0
|
11.0
|
16.0
|
21.0
|
26.0
|
31.0
|
41.0
|
51.0
|
61.0
|
71.0
|
81.0
|
91.0
|
∞
|
Polarimeter reading, At
|
14.80
|
14.10
|
12.70
|
11.50
|
10.70
|
10.00
|
8.60
|
7.80
|
7.40
|
6.75
|
6.35
|
5.75
|
-4.40
|
ln (At–A∞)
|
2.955
|
2.918
|
2.839
|
2.766
|
2.715
|
2.667
|
2.565
|
2.501
|
2.468
|
2.411
|
2.375
|
2.317
|
--
|
|
For a 1st order reaction,
ln(At–A∞) = -k t +
ln(Ao–A∞)
Gradient of the graphln (At–A∞) against
time
= -k
= -0.0137
Rate constant, k = 0.0137
min-1
|
Table of average angle
readings for urea HCl solution (A&D):
Time
t/min
|
3.0
|
13.0
|
18.0
|
23.0
|
28.0
|
38.0
|
48.0
|
58.0
|
68.0
|
78.0
|
88.0
|
∞
|
Polarimeter
reading, At
|
12.60
|
11.60
|
10.70
|
10.40
|
9.80
|
8.90
|
7.80
|
6.90
|
5.30
|
4.60
|
2.80
|
-5.60
|
ln
(At–A∞)
|
2.901
|
2.845
|
2.791
|
2.773
|
2.734
|
2.674
|
2.595
|
2.525
|
2.389
|
2.322
|
2.128
|
--
|
|
For a 1st order reaction,
ln(At–A∞) = -k t +
ln(Ao–A∞)
Gradient of the graphln (At–A∞) against
time
= -k = -0.0085
Rate constant, k = 0.0085
min-1
|
Degree of hydrolysis in urea
hydrochloride = = = 0.620
4. Discussion
Optical activity
A polarimeter
was used to determine the angle of optical
rotation of plane-polarized light passing through a solution. Only
chiral compounds are optically active compounds. Enantiomers of
chiral compounds have identical atoms and bonds, but the two different forms
have different optical properties. If plane polarized light is passed through a
solution of a chiral compound, one enantiomer rotates the plane of polarization
of the light clockwise and the other rotates the plane of polarized light
anticlockwise. The extent of this rotation depends on the nature of the
compound and the path length of the solution, as well as temperature and
concentration. Since the angle of rotation due to any molecular species
is proportional to its concentration, by measuring the angle of rotation for
the solution, the progress of the reaction can be monitored.
A standard measure of the degree to which a compound is
dextrorotary or levorotary is called the specific
rotation. Dextrorotary compounds have a positive specific rotation,
rotates the plane of plane polarized light clockwise, while levorotary
compounds have negative specific rotation.
In this experiment, the rate of reaction between
sucrose and water catalyzed by hydrogen ion can be determined by measuring the
angle of rotation of polarized light passing through the solution.
A dilute acidic
solution of sucrose is dextro-rotary with specific rotation=+66.5o.
When sucrose is converted into a laeve-rotary mixture of sucrose, fructose
(with specific rotation = -92o) and glucose (with specific rotation
= +52.7o).
Pseudo first
order reaction
The reaction is:
C12H22O11(sucrose) + H2O
+ H+ à C6H12O6(fructose)
+ C6H12O6(glucose) + H+
As the sucrose is used up and the glucose-fructose mixture
is formed, the angle of rotation clockwise becomes less and less, and finally
the light will be rotated anticlockwise.
For
hydrolysis of sucrose, the rate equation is written as rate = k[H2O]a[H+]b[C12H22O11]c.
No. of moles of sucrose used = (20.0096g/342.30
gmol-1)/(100/1000 mL)x(25/1000 mL) = 0.0146mol
No. of moles of HCl present as catalyst = 1M x
(25/1000 mL) = 0.025 mol
Concentration of water is approximated to be ≈ 55.5
M (large excess)
Acid
was used as a catalyst and will be regenerated at the end of the reaction.
Hence the concentration of acid can be assumed to be constant. Also, the
concentration of water is very large, 55.5 M. Thus, changes in concentration of
water will be insignificant. These results in a
pseudo-first order reaction, since all other reactants apart from sucrose, are in
large excess.
For a first order reaction, A P, the rate equation is: d[A]/dt = -k [A]
[A]t = [A]0e(-kt)
ln([A]t) =
ln([A]0) – kt
kt = ln([A]0)
– ln ([A]t)
k = ln = ln
or ln (At - A¥) = -kt + ln (A0 - A¥),
where t is time, At is the polarimeter reading at time t, A0
is the initial polarimeter reading and
A¥ is the polarimeter reading at the end of the reaction.
A¥ is the polarimeter reading at the end of the reaction.
From
the graphs of ln (At–A∞) against
time, a linear relationship was shown by the r2 value of lines to be
very close to 1 for both solutions. Therefore, the inversion of sucrose
in acid solution was a first order reaction with respect to sucrose.
The rate equation can be effectively written as rate = k’ [C12H22O11]where k’=
k[H2O][H+]. We can therefore show that the
reaction is overall a pseudo-first order, where only one of the reactant is not
in excess while the others are.
Dissociation
constants
The rate
constant for the HCl solution was higher than the rate constant for the urea hydrochloride
solution, this is expected because urea hydrochloride is a salt that weakly
hydrolyses in aqueous solution to give a small amount of H+. NH2.CO.NH3+
+ H2O ßà NH2.CO.NH2 + H3O+.This
incomplete dissociation to give H+ results in a lower concentration
of H+ ions in the solution to act as catalysts for the inversion of
sucrose. HCl is a strong acid which ionises completely to give H+
for the inversion of sucrose to occur. HCl + H2O à H3O+ + Cl-. Since the
velocity constant is directly proportional to the hydrogen ion concentration,
the rate constant for the inversion of sucrose in urea hydrochloride is lower
than that in HCl. Hence from the ratio of the rate constants, we can calculate
the degree of dissociation of urea hydrochloride, which was found to be 0.87.
Since the degree of dissociation is less than 1, this further confirms that
there was incomplete dissociation.
Sources of Errors & Improvements
There was some time lag in the mixing of solutions, transfer
of the mixture into the polarimeter tube and adjusting to the angle of
rotation. This resulted in loss of readings at the initial stage of the
reaction when the angle changed rapidly as reaction occurs as soon as the
mixtures were mixed. In addition, the reading of the angle of rotation from the
polarimeter takes time as the scale is very small and the reading of the angle of rotation is taken when the degree and
1/10 degree coincide. However, sometimes there is not only one set of line that
coincides, but rather, a few sets of line. Thus, the polarimeter reading may
not reliable. Taking three readings of angle of rotation in quick succession
and taking the average will reduce this error. Another way is to use computerized equipment that
can record both the time and polarimeter reading simultaneously.
In
addition, the temperature at which the experiment was conducted may be
changing, especially for the reading at 48 hours later. Since the rate constant
is dependent on the temperature according to the Arrhenius equation, the rate constant
will be affected. Furthermore, the equilibrium between the reactants and
products will be disturbed with fluctuations in temperature since by Le Chatelier’s
principle, the equilibrium would shift to oppose any changes on the system,
leading to changes in the concentration ratios of the mixture and affecting the
angle of rotation. To improve this, the experiment could be conducted in an air-conditioned
room instead to ensure that temperature is a constant.
5. Conclusion
The reaction for the inversion of sucrose was determined to be pseudo first order with respect to sucrose. The rate of reaction was also found to be proportional to H+ concentration. The rate constant for reaction in HCl was 0.0137 min-1. The rate constant for inversion of sucrose in urea hydrochloride was 0.0085 min-1. The degree of hydrolysis of urea hydrochloride was 0.620.
The reaction for the inversion of sucrose was determined to be pseudo first order with respect to sucrose. The rate of reaction was also found to be proportional to H+ concentration. The rate constant for reaction in HCl was 0.0137 min-1. The rate constant for inversion of sucrose in urea hydrochloride was 0.0085 min-1. The degree of hydrolysis of urea hydrochloride was 0.620.
6. Exercise
1) Explain the term
‘pseudo-first order’ by reference to the above reaction.
A pseudo-first order reaction is a reaction
where all reactants except for one, are in large excess. The reaction in the
experiment was
C12H22O11
+ H2O + H+ => C6H12O6
+ C6H12O6 + H+
Sucrose Glucose Fructose
Hence, the rate equation can be
written as:Rate = k[sucrose]a[H2O]b[H+]c,
where[sucrose],
[H2O] and [H+] are concentrations in mol/L, k is the rate
constant (unit dependent on the values of a, b and c) and a, b and c are the orders of reaction to be
determined from experiments with respect to sucrose, H2O and H+
respectively.
The initial concentration
of reactants, H2O and H+ were much larger than the
concentration of sucrose, with water present in large excess and acid in excess
and acting as catalyst, would be regenerated after reaction to maintain a
constant H+ concentration. Concentrations of these reactants remain
fairly constant over time, thus the reaction can be considered pseudo-first
order because it only depends on one reactant (the one that is not in excess as
its concentration changes). Sucrose is relatively not in large excess, and the
rate of reaction depending on the [sucrose] can be traced over time as the
reaction proceeds. From graph 1 and 2, the rate of inversion of sucrose was
found to be first order with respect to sucrose concentration, the rate
equation can be written as: Rate = Keff[sucrose], where Keff = k[H2O]b[H+]c.
With [H2O] and [H+] remaining
unchanged through the reaction, the rate equation appears to be first order
with respect to only sucrose. Hence this reaction is pseudo-first order.
2) How would you expect the specific rate constant for this
reaction to alter with the pH of the solution, for what reasons?
The specific rate constant is an
experimentally determined (proportionality) constant, which is different for
different reactions and changes with temperature, by the Arrhenius equation, k
= A e-Ea/RT, where A is the pre-exponential factor, Ea is the
activation energy, R is the gas constant and T is the temperature. H+
acts as catalyst in the experiment, the presence of catalyst increases the rate
of reaction by lowering the activation energy, more sucrose molecules will
possess the minimum required energy for reaction to occur, thus the specific
rate constant increases with H+ concentration at a given
temperature. In addition, we have experimentally determined that the rate of
inversion of sucrose increases with H+ concentration (from
calculations). Since pH
= - log10[H+], when the pH of the solution decreases, [H+]
increases. Since Keff is proportional to [H+], an
increase in [H+] (or decrease in pH) will
result in an increase in rate in a pseudo first order reaction. An increase in
pH on the other hand, will result in a decrease in rate.
7. References
·
Colby
College (2008)
Inversion of Sucrose.
Website: http://www.colby.edu/chemistry/PChem/lab/InversionSucrose.pdf
·
Retreived:
29 August, 2009.
·
Tel
Aviv University. (2004) Inversion of
Sucrose. Website: http://www.tau.ac.il/~phchlab/experiments/Sucrose/Sucrose.htm
·
Retreived:
29 August, 2009.
·
Engineering
Communication Centre, University of Toronto (2002)
Laboratory Reports. Website: http://www.ecf.utoronto.ca/~writing/handbook-lab.html
·
Retreived:
29 August, 2009.
·
Department
of Energy, USA. Newton, Ask a Scientist. (2003) Pure Water Concentration. Website: http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/chem03/chem03038.htm
·
Retreived:
29 August, 2009.
·
P.W. Atkins, Physical Chemistry, eighth
edition, Oxford University Press, 2006, pp.794-797.
·
Clayden,
Greeves, Warren and Wothers, Organic
Chemistry, Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 346-347.
You've provided quite good information here. This is fantastic since it expands our knowledge and is also beneficial to us. Thank you for sharing this piece of writing. Precision Linear Motors.
ReplyDelete