The lab report below was submitted as part of the coursework for
CM2132 Physical Chemistry. Please do not plagiarise from it as
plagiarism might land you into trouble with your university. Do note
that my report is well-circulated online and many of my juniors have
received soft copies of it. Hence, please exercise prudence while
referring to it and, if necessary, cite this webpage.
Solid A + solvent B
Solution
Aim To determine
the solubility behavior of naphthalene in toluene.
Results and
calculation
Amount of naphthalene added: 20.0
g
Solvent used: toluene
Melting point of naphthalene: 79.9 oC
Vol. of toluene used / mL
|
Temp. when crystals 1st appeared, T1
/ °C
|
Temp. when crystals disappeared, T2 / °C
|
Temperature required for saturation, T= (T1 + T2
)/ 2 / °C
|
2.00
|
74.7
|
74.2
|
74.4
|
4.00
|
68.7
|
69.2
|
69.0
|
6.00
|
64.7
|
65.3
|
65.0
|
8.00
|
60.9
|
61.1
|
61.0
|
10.00
|
56.8
|
57.5
|
57.2
|
12.00
|
53.1
|
54.2
|
53.6
|
14.00
|
51.0
|
51.7
|
51.4
|
16.00
|
48.0
|
48.3
|
48.2
|
20.00
|
42.1
|
42.8
|
42.4
|
24.00
|
38.3
|
39.3
|
38.8
|
Table 1: experimental data
Molar mass of naphthalene, C10H8 = (12.01 x 10) + (1.0079 x 8) = 128.16 g/mol No. of
moles of naphthalene = 20.0 / 128.16 = 0.1561 mol
When 2.00 ml of
toluene is added to naphthalene, Mass
of toluene = 2.00 x 0.82 = 1.64 g
No. of
moles of toluene = 1.64 / (12.01 x 7 + 1.0079 x 8) = 0.01780 mol
Mole fraction of naphthalene, x2 = 0.1561 / (0.1561 +
0.01780) = 0.8976
Volume of toluene used /
ml
|
Temperature
required for saturation, T / K
|
Solubility, mole
fraction of naphthalene, x2
|
Log x2
|
103 / T (K-1)
|
2.00
|
347.6
|
0.8976
|
-0.04690
|
2.877
|
4.00
|
342.2
|
0.8143
|
-0.08924
|
2.922
|
6.00
|
338.2
|
0.7451
|
-0.1278
|
2.957
|
8.00
|
334.2
|
0.6867
|
-0.1632
|
2.992
|
10.00
|
330.4
|
0.6368
|
-0.1960
|
3.027
|
12.00
|
326.8
|
0.5937
|
-0.2264
|
3.060
|
14.00
|
324.6
|
0.5560
|
-0.2549
|
3.081
|
16.00
|
321.4
|
0.5229
|
-0.2816
|
3.111
|
20.00
|
315.6
|
0.4672
|
-0.3305
|
3.169
|
24.00
|
312
|
0.4222
|
-0.3745
|
3.205
|
Table 2:
Solubility(x2), log x2 and 1000/T with various amount of
toluene added
Log x2 =
Ideal log x2
= ( -)
To plot ideal solubility line, arbitrary
values of log x2 are used to calculate the 1000/T (k-1)
values. Their respective values are being tabulated in Table 3 below.
Solubility, X2
|
log (X2)
|
1000/T (K-1)
|
1.00
|
0
|
2.83
|
0.40
|
-0.398
|
3.23
|
Table 3 : 1000/T (k) values for
respective log x2 values
Graph 1: graph of log x2 against 103
/ T (K-1)
From the equation of experimental data, y =
-0.991 x + 2.806, where y=log x2 and x=1000/T.
Therefore, gradient = -0.991 = -Lf
/ (2.303 x 8.314)
Lf = -0.991 x 2.303 x 8.314 ≈ 18.97 kJ mol-1.
Also, y-intercept = 2.806 = Lf /
(2.303 R) x 1000 / Tm
Tm = = 353.17K ≈ 80.0 0C
|
|
|
Solute A + solvent B
By Hess’s law, Heat of mixing = 19.02 – 18.97 = 0.05 kJ mol-1
Discussion
Solubility behaviour
Napthalene
may exhibit these solubility behaviours:
1)
Approximately ideal: when
dissolved in various non-polar or weakly polar solvents
2)
Less than ideal: when dissolved
in hydroxylic solvents
3)
Greater than ideal: when there
are also electrolytes in water
Diagram 1: How soluble a
solute is in a particular solvent depends on the relative strength of
intermolecular forces in the solute, solvent and solution. The stronger the
forces of intermolecular attraction in the solution, the more favoured mixing
will be.
The eventual solubility behaviours depend
on the relative strength of intermolecular solute-solute, solute-solvent and
solvent-solvent interactions. In this
experiment, non-polar naphthalene is dissolved in non-polar solvent toluene;
since the intermolecular forces of these two compounds are comparable, there is
little deviation from the behaviour of an ideal mixture.
If naphthalene is dissolved in polar,
hydroxylic solvents, its solubility behaviour will be less ideal than expected.
This is because the interaction between napthalene-hydroxylic solvent are
weaker than that between napthalene-napthalene or solvent-solvent; the
components have little affinity for each other, hence leading to poor mixing.
A positive deviation, meanwhile, will be
observed when naphthalene is dissolved in electrolytes in water. The resultant
strong attractive forces between the solute and solvent implies that mixing is
favourable and solubility, greater than ideal.
Deviation from ideal solution
An ideal solution has an enthalpy of mixing
of zero and obeys Raoult’s law[1]. The intermolecular forces between
solute-solute, solute-solvent and solvent-solvent of an ideal solution are the
same with that of the intermolecular interactions in the respective pure
compounds. When two liquids with ideal solubility are mixed, the temperature of
the mixture should remain constant.
The closer to zero the heat of mixing, the
more ideal the solution is. In this experiment, the experimental enthalpy of
mixing is 0.05 kJ mol-1. Napthalene and toluene have comparable
intermolecular interactions and hence, mixes almost ideally.
|
|
Naphthalene,
consisting of two fused benzene rings, is a non-polar compound with intermolecular
van der Waals attraction. Likewise, toluene is a non-polar compound with similar
induced dipole-induced dipole interactions. When naphthalene is mixed with
toluene, the enthalpy of mixing is almost zero; this may be attributed to the similar intermolecular forces between naphthalene-napthalene,
naphthalene-toluene and toluene-toluene. The solubility behaviour, as shown by
the almost overlap of experimental and ideal trend lines in graph one,
resembles that of an ideal solution.
In this experiment, the enthalpy of mixing,
while close to zero, is experimentally determined to be 0.05 kJ mol-1.
While naphthalene and toluene have comparable intermolecular interactions,
these forces of attraction are not exactly the same; the interactions between
solute-solute, solute-solvent and solvent-solvent do not have the same
strength. Therefore, the solution is mainly ideal, but not completely so.
Derivation of equation
At
equilibrium, the Gibbs free energy of solid naphthalene = Gibbs free energy of
naphthalene in solution[2]:
Gsolid* = Gsolute
= Gsolute* + RT ln x2 where x2 is
the mole fraction of solute.
Rearranging RT ln x2 = Gsolid*
- Gsolute*,
ln x2 = ΔGfus
/ RT
ln x2 = ΔHfus
/ RT – ΔSfus /R ---------------- (1)
For pure liquid, x2 =
1, T = Tm,
ln 1 =0 = ΔHfus / RTm
– ΔSfus / R ------------------(2)
(1)
– (2) ln x2 = ΔHfus
/R (1/T – 1/Tm)
ln x2 /( 2.303) = ΔHfus
/ ( 2.303 R) (1/T – 1/Tm)
lg x2 = Lf / (
2.303 R) (1/Tm – 1/T)
where ΔHfus is the standard
heat of fusion, amount of thermal energy absorbed for 1 mole of a substance to
change from solid to liquid state, and is also known as the latent heat of
fusion, Lf.
The graph of lg x2 is
plotted against 1/T to determine the latent heat of fusion and melting point of
naphthalene.
Precautions
Constant
stirring of the mixture in the boiling tube ensures even distribution of heat.
This prevents crystals from forming faster than expected – if cold water
accumulates at the top of the boiling tube – or crystals from disappearing
sooner than expected – perhaps at the bottom of the boiling tube, closer to the
heat source. Constant stirring, hence, ensures that the temperature at which
the crystal forms or dissolves may be more accurately determined.
Also,
a magnetic stirrer was placed in the water bath. This reduces the build-up of
heat at the bottom of the beaker, which may cause vigorous, therefore unsafe,
bubbling.
The
temperature of the water bath was maintained slightly above T1 for each
subsequent addition of toluene. This prevents crystals from appearing directly
when the boiling tube of mixture is replaced into the water bath for recording
T2.
Determination of melting point and
heat of fusion
The
melting point of the naphthalene calculated is 80.0 0C. This not
only compares favourably with the empirically observed melting point of 79.9 0C
but is also close to the literature value of 80.2 0C[5].
For further confirmation, the Büchi
melting point B-545 instrument
could be used. The magnifying lense in the instrument allows a more acute
observation of solid naphthalene and its melting phase, thereby leading to a
more accurate determination of its melting point.
The experimental heat of fusion worked out
to be 18.97 kJ mol-1, which is close to the reported value of 19.00
kJ mol-1[4].
Conclusion
The solubility
behavior of naphthalene in toluene is approximately ideal, albeit with slight deviation from an ideal solution. The experimentally
determined latent heat of fusion of napthalene, Lf, is 18.97 kJ mol-1,
while its melting point is 80.0 0C.
References
[1]
Chemguide. Raoult’s law and non-volatile solutes. Article retrieved on 20 Feb
2012:
<http://www.chemguide.co.uk/physical/phaseeqia/raoultnonvol.html>
[2]University of Waterloo. Gibbs free
energy and equilibrium. Article retrieved on 20 Feb 2012: <http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/~cchieh/cact/applychem/gibbsenergy.html>
[3] National Toxicology Program, Department
of Health and Human Services. Properties of naphthalene. Article retrieved on
18 Feb 2012:
< http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/index.cfm?objectid=E8841CC3-BDB5-82F8-F8FF6B2922FA31BA>
[4] National Institute of Standards and
Technology, Material Measurement Laboratory. Heat of fusion of naphthalene.
Article retrieved on 18 Feb 2012: <
http://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/cbook.cgi?ID=C91203&Units=SI&Mask=1EFF
The equations, graph and diagram do not show!
ReplyDeleteI am some what confused on the way you determined the mass of toluene ,
ReplyDelete2.00X"0.82"?
The graph is not shown
ReplyDeleteThis is important information which is shared by you. This info is meaningful and important for everyone to increase our knowledge about it. research chemicals shop nachnahme
ReplyDeleteimunan-he Brandi Sampy https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=armyoten-a.Corona-Blossom-Vol-3-Journey-To-The-Stars-gratuita
ReplyDeleteinavifchar
tiomiVcon-pu-1979 Michael Suggs Cinema 4D
ReplyDeleteExpress VPN
Cisco Packet Tracer
softsucraca
OconsheMcresku Joe Bonsness Free download
ReplyDeleteThere
icdedere